AI Engineer Portal
Your personal operating system for career transition.
Exercise
Multi-agent handoff protocol
Multi-Agent Handoff Protocol
As agent systems grow, a single monolithic agent becomes unwieldy. The multi-agent pattern splits work among specialist agents (e.g., a researcher, a coder, a reviewer) with a coordinator that routes tasks and aggregates results. The critical engineering challenge is the handoff protocol: how agents pass context to each other cleanly.
What you are building
Create a multi-agent handoff system with:
- Agent base class — each agent has a name, a description of its capabilities, and a
handle(task)method. - HandoffContext — a structured object that carries the task description, conversation history, intermediate results, and metadata between agents.
- Coordinator — routes tasks to the appropriate specialist based on task type, collects results, and handles failures (retry, skip, or escalate).
- Handoff protocol — when an agent cannot complete a task, it returns a
HandoffRequestindicating which specialist should take over and what context to pass. - Result aggregation — the coordinator collects results from multiple agents and produces a unified response.
Why this matters
Multi-agent architectures are how production AI systems handle complex workflows: customer support (triage agent -> specialist agent -> quality review agent), code generation (planner -> coder -> tester), research (search agent -> analysis agent -> writing agent). The handoff protocol is where most multi-agent systems break — context gets lost, errors cascade, and the coordinator loses track of state.
Constraints
- Each agent must be independently testable with mock inputs.
- The coordinator must handle agent failures without crashing the entire workflow.
- HandoffContext must be serializable (to dict) for logging and debugging.
- Support a maximum depth for handoff chains to prevent infinite delegation.
Agents / advanced / Step 6 of 8
Agent architecture patterns
Focus on explicit control surfaces — function schemas, state machines, and structured outputs. Agents are most useful when the task requires dynamic tool selection or multi-step reasoning. Start with the simplest pattern (single tool call) before reaching for ReAct loops.
- - Tools return structured, typed responses
- - Agent completes the task within a bounded number of steps
- - All tool calls include error handling and retries
- - Memory/state management prevents unbounded context growth
- - Tool schemas validate inputs and handle errors gracefully
- - Agent loop has explicit termination conditions
- - State is serializable and inspectable between steps
- - Cost and token usage are tracked per invocation
- - Fallback behavior exists for tool call failures
Practice
Generate a variation
Generate a new exercise variation to deepen understanding or practice a related concept.
Attempt history
Recent submissions
Before you submit, decide what a strong answer should make obvious to the reviewer.
No attempts yet.